Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: Linkex on googles ban list?

  1. #1
    Traffic Guru SeXy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    218

    Arrow Linkex on googles ban list?

    Is linkex on googles ban list?
    ICQ : 445 608 199

  2. #2
    Serious Contributor PXN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    954

    Default

    Most likely, but I don't know.

  3. #3
    Traffic Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    202

    Default

    Never heard something about this so far, so I think its not on BigG's banlist
    ICQ: 15three-45four-84one Mail/MSN/AIM: myvibes at gmx dot net

  4. #4
    Traffic Guru gerdking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    269

    Default

    currently many sites which using linkex are high listed...so they are not on banlist.

    but i think its more a mather of time until this will happen.

  5. #5
    Traffic Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    202

    Default

    and how should google notice that linkex is installed? you can edit the whole output so no linkex comment will be placed on your site and if you change the dir of linkex then you should be on the save side...
    ICQ: 15three-45four-84one Mail/MSN/AIM: myvibes at gmx dot net

  6. #6
    Serious Contributor TheBeginning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Spain (Mallorca)
    Posts
    1,763

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chickahoona View Post
    and how should google notice that linkex is installed? you can edit the whole output so no linkex comment will be placed on your site and if you change the dir of linkex then you should be on the save side...
    There are so many many ways to find sites using linkex.
    (If a WM is able to find it, Mr-G also)
    And it doesnt matter the dir of a script imho

  7. #7
    Jack-of-all-trades JACOBKELL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    In motion
    Posts
    4,565

    Default

    Yes if google doesn't know for linkex then it cant penalize site beacuse of it.Also it was funny when someone said how can you be penalized with using lo,which is impossible since google cannot see any part of lo,lo just generate clean html links which you could manualy generate.You could be penalized only if you do too much non-relevant link exchanges.

  8. #8
    From the hood
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    203

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBeginning View Post
    There are so many many ways to find sites using linkex.
    (If a WM is able to find it, Mr-G also)
    And it doesnt matter the dir of a script imho
    If the output is plain HTML url's, you cannot see the code has been generated by linkex

  9. #9
    Jack-of-all-trades JACOBKELL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    In motion
    Posts
    4,565

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBeginning View Post
    There are so many many ways to find sites using linkex.
    (If a WM is able to find it, Mr-G also)
    And it doesnt matter the dir of a script imho
    You can deny access to linkex with robots.txt

  10. #10
    Serious Contributor
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    who wants me?
    Posts
    735

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JACOBKELL View Post
    You can deny access to linkex with robots.txt
    and you think google will listen your robots.txt? LOL

    you can always install linkex in different directory like "skfdjsakjrf" and do not post that url anywhere aldo you can forbidden that directory with pass protect .htpasswd and give away pass to your traders or just set up now traders manual
    POWERED BY REPLICATORS

  11. #11
    Man, myth, legend. DamageX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Nomad
    Posts
    20,750

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JACOBKELL View Post
    You can deny access to linkex with robots.txt
    Quote Originally Posted by PinkFloyd View Post
    and you think google will listen your robots.txt? LOL
    Even if it did, denying access to linkex in your robots.txt is just about as retarded as telling your kid not to look in the jar for cookies, in hopes of him not realizing there are cookies there.
    Work Smarter At Working Smarter

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DamageX View Post
    Even if it did, denying access to linkex in your robots.txt is just about as retarded as telling your kid not to look in the jar for cookies, in hopes of him not realizing there are cookies there.
    Exactly, any type of commenting out, htaccess, robots, noindex/nofollow just confirms and tells them you are in fact using an automated link script.

    Which OBVIOUSLY is against what they want to see.
    linkspun - Premier Adult Link Trade Community - ICQ - 464/\281/\250

  13. #13
    Serious Contributor
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    who wants me?
    Posts
    735

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jdoughs View Post
    Exactly, any type of commenting out, htaccess, robots, noindex/nofollow just confirms and tells them you are in fact using an automated link script.

    Which OBVIOUSLY is against what they want to see.
    with .htpasswd google wont know that you have linkex installed in "asdksajhdsa" directory so it also wont know that you are using automated link script.
    POWERED BY REPLICATORS

  14. #14
    I am a meat popsicle
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Olongapo, Philippines
    Posts
    1,586

    Default

    I have a site that uses linxex - a blog - that ranks #1 for it's primary keyphrase. No changes in my google traffic at all. I think people are seeing google changes and are jumping to conclusions about the software being involved.

    I don't see any reason that google would ever say "let's devalue all sites that use a certain peice of software". It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

    If anything, they would apply filters to a type of site.

    Suppose they did target trade scripts, TGP/MGP scripts, etc.. don't you think they would first target scripts like DTR?

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PinkFloyd View Post
    with .htpasswd google wont know that you have linkex installed in "asdksajhdsa" directory so it also wont know that you are using automated link script.
    Until the second day you are using it and a webmaster with google toolbar visits the page to sign up.

    Don't think they can't see this, or that they don't note it. And even more importantly is google is like your mother.

    She remembers everything you did, good or bad, and going back from the day you first were born (registered) til today. And if she hears about something today, all she has to do is check its memory (cache/index) for where you were, and what you were doing back 3 years ago, all that info is there for them, they keep it all like an elephants memory, just like mom.

    If you use auto generated linking systems, there is virtually NO - WAY to hide it, unless you also do not show it to webmasters.


    EDIT, Just realized you said pass directory above and not just htaccess.

    Put it behind a pass protected directory, or members area is about the only safe way (that I can think of)
    Last edited by jdoughs; June 24th, 2009 at 10:53 AM.
    linkspun - Premier Adult Link Trade Community - ICQ - 464/\281/\250

  16. #16

    Default

    For The Record Linkex isn't currently being targeted, but im confident its day will soon come.

    The post on GFY was just a scare tactic or joke post.
    linkspun - Premier Adult Link Trade Community - ICQ - 464/\281/\250

  17. #17
    Serious Contributor
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    who wants me?
    Posts
    735

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jdoughs View Post
    If you use auto generated linking systems, there is virtually NO - WAY to hide it, unless you also do not show it to webmasters.

    Put it behind a pass protected directory, or members area is about the only safe way (that I can think of)
    This is what Im talking about. For new site where linkex was always hidden behind htpasswd and you only set up trades manual (I think this is the right way because giving away opportunity to add everything to your website by everyone is just stupid) there is no chance that google will find you soft...

    EDIT, now I see you EDIT your post
    POWERED BY REPLICATORS

  18. #18

    Default

    LOL Yeah sorry Pink, the coffee wasnt that strong today, im still half in the sack.
    linkspun - Premier Adult Link Trade Community - ICQ - 464/\281/\250

  19. #19
    brown sugar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,423

    Default

    am just looking at a site with an open linkex form ranking well for it's keyword.

    typical internet bullshit.
    why not?

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bud View Post
    am just looking at a site with an open linkex form ranking well for it's keyword.

    typical internet bullshit.

    What you need to think about is google will forever know that the site had an 'open form' for its link trades. If and when they decide to do something about it (which they talk about constantly) it will be easy to target.

    Why risk it? I build sites long term, I want shit to take rank and stay, I will not allow any script, CMS or shady neighborhoods to hinder my chances.
    linkspun - Premier Adult Link Trade Community - ICQ - 464/\281/\250

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •