Go Back   AskDamageX.com Webmaster Forum > General > Webmaster Business & Traffic Main Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old February 16th, 2008, 06:26 AM   #1 (permalink)
Lonewolf Internet Sales
 
Toby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,223
Default Shap & RedTube, your thoughts?

I see the Twistys and ShapCash are sponsors here. Just wondering what y'all think of Shap's recent announcement on GFY about his deal with RedTube, plus the pre-checked cross sales to Brazzers.

I don't much care for either one.
Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 06:49 AM   #2 (permalink)
Serious Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 787
Default

I think they made a deal with the devil.

- Dropped them as soon as I read his post.

Sponsoring content theft is the last thing anyone should do.
Redtube are hurting because they only getting payments from AFF and a few other dating sites. If no one sponsored them they would close down.
__________________
zorgman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 07:51 AM   #3 (permalink)
D'oh!!
 
willwank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,145
Default

Never promoted neither of them and now I'm sure I never will. No good this imho.
__________________
"If you put a thing in the center of your life, who lacks power to nourish, it will eventually destroy you, and everything you are"
Oh btw, it's come full circle. Node/V8 - Low Level Server Side JavaScript. Benchmarked here - libs & packages here - read up here
Other stuff:: Textpattern CMS | Vim | Douglas Crockford | GT.M db |@willwankman | 437654594
willwank is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 08:55 AM   #4 (permalink)
Who does #2 work for?
 
AmateurFlix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,986
Default

huh?

well somebody's getting dropped from my review site in 3.. 2.. 1.. gone
AmateurFlix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 09:15 AM   #5 (permalink)
Who does #2 work for?
 
AmateurFlix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,986
Default

I just read that post.

I haven't seen a more convoluted rationalization in quite some time. His argument seems to be that an affiliate may promote a site using stolen content, so long as the page HIS links are on do not contain stolen content.

I especially liked the part where he claimed that file sharing is forcing musicians to make better songs in recent years
AmateurFlix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 09:29 AM   #6 (permalink)
D'oh!!
 
willwank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AmateurFlix
I especially liked the part where he claimed that file sharing is forcing musicians to make better songs in recent years
Says it all I think
__________________
"If you put a thing in the center of your life, who lacks power to nourish, it will eventually destroy you, and everything you are"
Oh btw, it's come full circle. Node/V8 - Low Level Server Side JavaScript. Benchmarked here - libs & packages here - read up here
Other stuff:: Textpattern CMS | Vim | Douglas Crockford | GT.M db |@willwankman | 437654594
willwank is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 10:07 AM   #7 (permalink)
Jack-of-all-trades
 
JACOBKELL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In motion
Posts: 4,561
Default

I think shap will lose a lot's of moonies beacuse he will lose a lot of regular webmasters which can bring much much more money then redtube.I bet redtube only bring loses to advertisers beacuse such traffic is worthless in most cases.As xxxjay said,such traffic convert 0:50000.In shortly,there is no sense to have any connection with redtube.
__________________
*************************Unstoppable innovation machine***********
JACOBKELL is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 10:23 AM   #8 (permalink)
Serious Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JACOBKELL
I think shap will lose a lot's of moonies beacuse he will lose a lot of regular webmasters which can bring much much more money then redtube.I bet redtube only bring loses to advertisers beacuse such traffic is worthless in most cases.As xxxjay said,such traffic convert 0:50000.In shortly,there is no sense to have any connection with redtube.
Sadly, I think you are mistaken. There are a few webmasters that have a backbone, the rest, well, they just don't.

Look at how many sites still promote AFF, Brazzers, Sexsearch, Quickbuck, Adultadworld and so on. Drinkinghard(GTS) even came out for the defense of Adultadworld last night on gfy.


Wasn't it the 4th quarter or so last year that Shap made a post about prechecked cross sales being bad? I don't remember the exact time he made the post but it was the same time it was discovered that Quickbuck was popping their join pages over CCBill and Epoch join pages in an effort to steal sales. And now having pre-checked sales to Brazzers.

I use to admire that program(twistys) and even recommend it. Now here are even more reasons to never do that again about any program as it appears you just never know..
Spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 11:06 AM   #9 (permalink)
Jack-of-all-trades
 
JACOBKELL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In motion
Posts: 4,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spence
Sadly, I think you are mistaken. There are a few webmasters that have a backbone, the rest, well, they just don't.

Look at how many sites still promote AFF, Brazzers, Sexsearch, Quickbuck, Adultadworld and so on. Drinkinghard(GTS) even came out for the defense of Adultadworld last night on gfy.


Wasn't it the 4th quarter or so last year that Shap made a post about prechecked cross sales being bad? I don't remember the exact time he made the post but it was the same time it was discovered that Quickbuck was popping their join pages over CCBill and Epoch join pages in an effort to steal sales. And now having pre-checked sales to Brazzers.

I use to admire that program(twistys) and even recommend it. Now here are even more reasons to never do that again about any program as it appears you just never know..
I didnt said they will lose entire their webmaster base,i only said they will lose some part of it beacuse of it and that's way they should drop redtube(after all shap said he would donate all money generated by redtube).And yes i am fully aware aff is still number one dating sponsor on tgp sites and others.
__________________
*************************Unstoppable innovation machine***********
JACOBKELL is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 11:51 AM   #10 (permalink)
howdy dowdy!
 
arock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,265
Default

HAHA thats a joke. I remeber Shap getting his panties all in a bunch for babe blogs having AFF running on the same page as galleries promoting his content (with links to twistys of course).

But now he thinks its ok to deal with redtube? ha
__________________
arock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 12:10 PM   #11 (permalink)
Serious Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 647
Default

I saw shap said the AVERAGE ratio for tubesites are 1:1500-1:3000? Jesus, it's not terrible but average? Why the hell would you want an average ratio of 1:3000 over good blog/tgp traffic at 1:200 or less
__________________
boners
mechanicvirus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 12:37 PM   #12 (permalink)
FreeOnes Team
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mechanicvirus
I saw shap said the AVERAGE ratio for tubesites are 1:1500-1:3000? Jesus, it's not terrible but average? Why the hell would you want an average ratio of 1:3000 over good blog/tgp traffic at 1:200 or less
I think any program with an average of 1:1500 is a good one actually. Not much sites will produce a large volume of sales on 1:200 anyways
__________________
Contact info:
ICQ: 123891112
Email: roald |A|T| freeones dot com
Url: FreeOnes.com
Quashe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 12:39 PM   #13 (permalink)
ex-TeenGodFather
 
Jakke PNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mechanicvirus
I saw shap said the AVERAGE ratio for tubesites are 1:1500-1:3000? Jesus, it's not terrible but average? Why the hell would you want an average ratio of 1:3000 over good blog/tgp traffic at 1:200 or less
Why not? I fail to see your point really..
Why can't shap have the blogs sales AND the tube sales? Why would he have to choose either, or? Why should shap care if the tube owners can't convert their traffic. It's basically free money to shap. (aside from the fact that they may or may not be abusing his content).
__________________
Mainly mainstream nowdays
Jakke PNG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 12:53 PM   #14 (permalink)
Who does #2 work for?
 
AmateurFlix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,986
Default

the ratios are not really relevant; my understanding is that tube sites have terrible CTR's anyway, so even 1:500 might be a lousy ratio if they had to generate 10X as many impressions per banner/link click.

the part about this that really annoys me is that he's not only benefiting from traffic derived from using other people's stolen content (albeit on different pages of the same site) but he seems to be advocating this premise to others as well.

I wonder if he would encourage an affiliate that is using other forms of illegal content elsewhere on their domain, just not on the same page as his links. it's really no different...
AmateurFlix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 01:00 PM   #15 (permalink)
ex-TeenGodFather
 
Jakke PNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AmateurFlix
the part about this that really annoys me is that he's not only benefiting from traffic derived from using other people's stolen content (albeit on different pages of the same site) but he seems to be advocating this premise to others as well.
If EVERYONE (sponsors) would do this, then there wouldn't be any illegal tube sites, as all the content would be sponsor-regulated. (ripped DVD's are becoming irrelevant too since the big companies have online presence already).
__________________
Mainly mainstream nowdays
Jakke PNG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 01:01 PM   #16 (permalink)
ex-TeenGodFather
 
Jakke PNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,933
Default

..just to be clear though, I don't use any tube advertising on porngreen. Nor have I any plans to do it. So, that's not the reason I'm "defending" shap.
__________________
Mainly mainstream nowdays
Jakke PNG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 01:03 PM   #17 (permalink)
FreeOnes Team
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeenGodFather
If EVERYONE (sponsors) would do this, then there wouldn't be any illegal tube sites, as all the content would be sponsor-regulated. (ripped DVD's are becoming irrelevant too since the big companies have online presence already).
Maybe in fairy tale land but never in the world we live in right now
__________________
Contact info:
ICQ: 123891112
Email: roald |A|T| freeones dot com
Url: FreeOnes.com
Quashe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 01:05 PM   #18 (permalink)
ex-TeenGodFather
 
Jakke PNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quashe
Maybe in fairy tale land but never in the world we live in right now
True. I said IF.
Also, IF all free content vanished overnight, we'd start to make mad bling.
Wishful thinking..
__________________
Mainly mainstream nowdays
Jakke PNG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 01:07 PM   #19 (permalink)
FreeOnes Team
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeenGodFather
True. I said IF.
Also, IF all free content vanished overnight, we'd start to make mad bling.
Wishful thinking..
I know but some people tend to believe the theory lol

BTW drop me a line at roald @at freeones .com please, we never got your reviews up as the pass doesn't seem to mwork anymore. Thnx
__________________
Contact info:
ICQ: 123891112
Email: roald |A|T| freeones dot com
Url: FreeOnes.com
Quashe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2008, 01:48 PM   #20 (permalink)
Serious Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeenGodFather
Why not? I fail to see your point really..
Why can't shap have the blogs sales AND the tube sales? Why would he have to choose either, or? Why should shap care if the tube owners can't convert their traffic. It's basically free money to shap. (aside from the fact that they may or may not be abusing his content).
Besides the tubesites giving out too much? Sure then I would take both. I guess im just used to always trying to lower my ratios that I see numbers like 1:3000 and forget some people pull those number but with way more sales.
__________________
boners
mechanicvirus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:49 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0