Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: I was only kidding!

  1. #1
    Hope and Cha---
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,379

    Default I was only kidding!

    OBAMA: I not only have pledged not to raise their taxes, I’ve been the first candidate in this race to specifically say I would cut their taxes. We are going to offset the payroll tax, the most regressive of our taxes, so that families who are middle-income individuals making $75,000 a year or less, that they would get a tax break so that families would see up to $1,000 worth of relief.

    Cut to the real world.......

    "Using the newly-released 2002 input-output accounts we present new estimates of the distributional impact of a typical cap-and-trade system by income, age, U.S. region and family type. In total, households would face an annual burden of roughly $144.8 billion per year with costs disproportionately borne by low-income households, those under age 25 and over 75 years, those in Southern states, and single parents with dependent children."

    The Tax Foundation - Who Pays for Climate Policy? New Estimates of the Household Burden and Economic Impact of a U.S. Cap-and-Trade System
    The Tax Foundation - Household Cap-and-Trade Burden Calculator

  2. #2
    LifestyleAmateurs.com nation-x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Rock Hill, SC
    Posts
    8,779

    Default

    Cap and Trade is not a tax... saying so is dishonest

  3. #3
    Serious Contributor NobleSavage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    1,987

    Default

    And the CBO who has a reputation for accuracy and real numbers puts the figure at $175.

    http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/103xx/doc...TradeCosts.pdf

    I never thought the conservatives would be in favor of socialism. Let the people who use energy the most pay for the costs associated with that energy. This will encourage people to make rational choices... Isn't that the free market line?

  4. #4
    Hope and Cha---
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nation-x View Post
    Cap and Trade is not a tax... saying so is dishonest
    Really? It's a tax on energy consumption. The admin may want to call it "energy revenues" but that is spin speak for "energy tax".
    You say potatoe.....I say potato.

  5. #5
    Hope and Cha---
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NobleSavage View Post
    And the CBO who has a reputation for accuracy and real numbers puts the figure at $175.

    http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/103xx/doc...TradeCosts.pdf

    I never thought the conservatives would be in favor of socialism. Let the people who use energy the most pay for the costs associated with that energy. This will encourage people to make rational choices... Isn't that the free market line?
    Yep....and

    "Note also that the CBO analysis is an average for the country as a whole. It doesn't take into account the fact that certain regions and populations will be more severely hit than others -- manufacturing states more than service states; coal producing states more than states that rely on hydro or natural gas."

    I also want to toss in implications from the CBO:

    "The resource cost does not indicate the potential decrease in gross domestic product (GDP) that could result from the cap."

  6. #6
    Serious Contributor NobleSavage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    1,987

    Default

    As the House vote on the American Clean Energy and Security Act approached this week, prominent media conservatives once again took to the airwaves and displayed their true colors. Criticism of the bill from the right -- especially its cap-and-trade provisions -- has not been the product of principle, but of misinformation and, at times, willful denial.

    On Friday, radio host Rush Limbaugh once again flagrantly denied that global warming exists and continued to advance the shockingly erroneous, comically false argument that under the legislation, "we could be taxed because of the carbon dioxide we exhale." Thanks, Professor Limbaugh, for another science lesson!

    "This bill is about raising taxes and taking away people's freedom," Limbaugh continued, before comparing it to a "Soviet-style five-year plan" that is "all based on hoaxes," a crooked scheme worthy of Bernie Madoff.

    The fearmongering continued as Fox News' Glenn Beck agreed with Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) when she argued of the bill, "You're either for freedom or you're not."

    Indeed, portraying the legislation as a massive financial penalty for ordinary Americans is a major line of attack for media conservatives. Thursday's Fox & Friends claimed that the average family would have to pay an extra $3,100 a year in energy costs if it passed. But that number is based on a distortion of a 2007 MIT study -- a distortion that has since been discredited by one of the study's authors. Fox's Sean Hannity also pushed a similar myth, claiming that the bill would cost families $2,000 a year.
    Media Matters: Busting a cap and trade in their ... spin | Media Matters for America

    Lies and distortion... business as usual, I guess.

  7. #7
    Serious Contributor NobleSavage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    1,987

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Actorguy View Post
    Yep....and

    "Note also that the CBO analysis is an average for the country as a whole. It doesn't take into account the fact that certain regions and populations will be more severely hit than others -- manufacturing states more than service states; coal producing states more than states that rely on hydro or natural gas."
    Isn't the right wing line that business that don't pay taxes.. they just pass them down the line to the consumer? So people will choose products more wisely. Why should one state have to subsidize another state? If the Federal government decides to bail out California you will be screaming "SOCALISM".


    I also want to toss in implications from the CBO:
    "The resource cost does not indicate the potential decrease in gross domestic product (GDP) that could result from the cap."
    DUH, and it doesn't take into account the huge possible upside of fostering the alt energy economy.

  8. #8
    LifestyleAmateurs.com nation-x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Rock Hill, SC
    Posts
    8,779

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Actorguy View Post
    Really? It's a tax on energy consumption. The admin may want to call it "energy revenues" but that is spin speak for "energy tax".
    You say potatoe.....I say potato.
    So when the price of oil goes up that is a tax? Your reasoning is bullshit.

  9. #9

  10. #10
    Hope and Cha---
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,379

    Default



    The exact responses I suspected. "Bullshit". "Right-wing". "Conservative".

    "DUH, and it doesn't take into account the huge possible upside of fostering the alt energy economy."
    Hey. I was just quoting the "CBO who has a reputation for accuracy and real numbers". DUH, I am sure the alt energy sector will more than make up for the losses.

  11. #11
    LifestyleAmateurs.com nation-x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Rock Hill, SC
    Posts
    8,779

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Actorguy View Post


    The exact responses I suspected. "Bullshit". "Right-wing". "Conservative".
    If the shoe fits... If I started posting liberal positions/articles here like you and aflix do, I am sure you would classify them as bullshit or liberal.

  12. #12
    Traffic Guru tuab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    354

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nation-x View Post
    So when the price of oil goes up that is a tax? Your reasoning is bullshit.
    tax
    Definition
    A fee charged ("levied") by a government on a product, income, or activity.

    When Oil goes up it is not a tax because nothing of it is going to the government, well if they wouldn't tax it anyway

  13. #13
    LifestyleAmateurs.com nation-x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Rock Hill, SC
    Posts
    8,779

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tuab View Post
    tax
    Definition
    A fee charged ("levied") by a government on a product, income, or activity.

    When Oil goes up it is not a tax because nothing of it is going to the government, well if they wouldn't tax it anyway
    Exactly... there are no fees associated with cap and trade for some years. The carbon credits will be given to existing companies at no charge. The cost involved is retrofitting to capture emissions. This isn't a tax.

  14. #14
    Serious Contributor NobleSavage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    1,987

    Default

    I think I figured it out. ActorGuy is on the payroll of one of these astroturf firms in DC. He gets paid to post links to BS.

  15. #15
    Hope and Cha---
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NobleSavage View Post
    I think I figured it out. ActorGuy is on the payroll of one of these astroturf firms in DC. He gets paid to post links to BS.
    LOL

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •